The source of this article is https://fonte.news. The article reveals a deep judicial crisis in Estonia, where a large community of officials, lawyers, and Freemasons—among them the father of a child—is attempting to unlawfully and forcefully take a child away from her mother. Here is a summary of the story:
They are not human because they don’t understand when a child says NO 90 times.
The actions of Estonian state officials and judges have exceeded the bounds of law and human rights—there exists a hierarchy. The highest power above laws is the word of a living person—words have power, and the word of a child cannot be taken away by any law, person, or authority. Why hasn’t this case been resolved, and why haven’t the officials been held accountable?
When a child is left unprotected and her voice is forcibly silenced, how can a safe and healthy society emerge? Fonte.News has been covering the case of Kristiina Heinmets’ child since October 5, 2024. Since the publication, the editorial office has received hundreds of letters from mothers and fathers with similar experiences. This reflects the inhumane attitude of Estonian institutions and officials toward children and family values—a broken worldview and a lack of morality. Yet, this is only a visible part of the reality—the state of child safety and justice is catastrophic. Look at the individuals and names in the picture—do you see intelligent human beings with soul and life?
This article has been coordinated with Kristiina Heinmets and is based on the information received from her.
Kristiina Heinmets, the child’s mother, writes in despair:
“In the past 11 months, my daughter has said over 60 times that she does not want to live with her father. She has expressed this directly during court-ordered visitations to Aivar Aigro.
She wants to live with her mother. How many times and for how many years must a child say she doesn’t want to live with her father? How many repetitions are enough for the Estonian court, and how long must a child endure pressure from judges to live with her father?
Children must not be forced, and physical coercion is prohibited; yet, the lawyer Kadi Sitska, representing both my daughter and elderly residents of Pihlakodu as a state representative, advocates for this! Just as the rape of elderly women was deemed insufficiently painful, the use of physical force against a child is referred to as short-term trauma in documents submitted to court by Kadi Sitska!
My daughter has expressed her wishes four times directly in court to Judge Ahti Kuuseväli.
In 11 months, she has told at least 33 officials and 9 child welfare specialists that she wants to live with her mother.
In the past 3.5 months, she has met with her father approximately 36 times and said NO. All meetings occurred at her school, in front of classmates, and the court has refused to amend the visitation order. The entire situation is uncomfortable and burdensome for the child.
The father has refused compromises for four years. The child’s representative lies and falsifies documents for court purposes. Child protection services do not defend the child (instead, they support the father and force the child to go with him regardless of her opposition). Where can Amelie find help?
On April 8, 2025, a third court petition was filed by Kadi Sitska to remove the child from her mother. How is it possible, in 21st-century civilized Europe, that a state-paid (tax-funded) lawyer supports rape and the physical and emotional abuse of a child as acceptable behavior?”
People involved in the case and their roles (as seen in the photo). They do not consider the child’s will – a blatant violation of human rights:
- Ahti Kuuseväli – notorious judge who has consistently ignored the child’s wishes and stripped the mother of all rights. Three rulings initiated by him—two of them based on Kadi Sitska’s requests—have been declared illegal and void by the District Court. The third decision involved sealing evidence submitted by Andra Olm from Kristiina and her legal team, which is impermissible in court practice. After Kristiina exposed it, the judge revoked the order.
- Helen Hääl – lawyer whose affair with Aivar Aigro allegedly motivated them to illegally remove the child from her mother. Though her actions failed in court, they initiated this violent legal process. The romantic affair ended when Aigro left her.
- Astrid Asi – former Chair of Harju County Court and now Prosecutor General, who has failed to see any illegality in the judges’ actions and thus implicitly endorsed the suppression of the child’s will.
- Risto Sepp – bailiff who, along with child welfare specialist Margrit Pitkve, played a major role in taking the child from Kristiina. He had an affair with Pitkve, both of whom have children and partners. Sepp continues to harass Kristiina with numerous legal proceedings.
- Terje Krais – head of Tallinn City Legal Department, who emailed lawyers claiming Kristiina was under the influence of drugs, without medical grounds, abusing her position.
- Marge Rungi – head of Central Tallinn’s child protection unit, who never considered the child’s will and did everything to force the child to live with the father against her wishes.
- Margrit Pitkve – allegedly abused her own sons, attempted to harm her children’s father’s partner, and was in a romantic relationship with Sepp. Known for breaking procedures and laws to take the child from Kristiina. Still employed at the Social Insurance Board as a family mediator.
- Villu Kõve – Chief Justice, who has not removed judges who violated the law from office.
- Raili Suits – head of the Nõmme Security Center, who ignored the mother and daughter lying on the stairs as the father forcibly took the child. No one intervened—neither Sepp, Pitkve, nor the police. She also prevented Kristiina from meeting her child in a humane manner.
- Kadi Sitska – state-appointed guardian of Kristiina’s daughter, who was supposed to defend the child’s will but has instead lied to the court and concealed the child’s interests. Known also for downplaying a murder in the Aruküla case and minimizing the rape of a demented elderly woman.
- Andra Olm – lawyer defending Aivar Aigro, accused of falsifying documents and leaking confidential court materials to the media (e.g., a Portuguese court case sent to journalist Sulev Vedler).
- Erki Vabamets, Karmen Turk, Maarja Pild – lawyers at Triniti Law Firm defending Aivar Aigro, prolonging the child’s emotional abuse and legal harassment.
- Aivar Aigro – biological father of Kristiina’s daughter, who disregards the child’s will and uses Freemason influence and wealth to force custody. He floods the court system with lawsuits, aiming to destroy Kristiina. This is supported by four rulings, one of which is pending enforcement.
- Toomas Tomberg – notorious prosecutor mentioned in other Fonte.News cases. In this case, he handles all criminal proceedings initiated by Aigro against Kristiina. The police recently reported that, “just in case,” no new criminal investigations would be launched based on Kristiina’s complaints.
We will continue to follow this case and provide updates. We hope that justice will prevail, the officials who violated the law will be held accountable, and the child’s relationship with her mother will be preserved.
