Judge Ahti Kuuseväli has been the focus of attention in the Estonian legal system due to suspicious situations in his activities that indicate possible violations of the law and biased verdicts. Although Kuuseväli has served as a judge for many years, several of his decisions and actions have raised questions about his impartiality and legitimacy.
1. Biased decisions and ethical issues
Kuuseväli has come under criticism on several occasions due to suspicions that her decisions have been biased. There have been cases where her decisions have given preferences to certain interest groups, which has raised questions in the legal community about her independence and objectivity. For example, there have been several cases where her decisions have favored certain parties with political or economic interests.
The investigative press has received information (not from Kristiina Heinmets): The most recent case is that Ahti Kuuseväli decided to ignore the notarial contract, humanity and with her decision gave impetus to child protection worker Margrit Pitkve to take the child away from the mother and place the child in a children’s shelter because the child refused to go to the father. Kristiina Heinmets had suffered repeated violence during her marriage, both physical and psychological. Based on the notarial contract, the father took two children to raise and Kristiina was left with one child. However, the children’s father began to break the agreement and do everything to take the third child away from the mother. According to the source, the children have not wanted to go to their father and everything has happened against the children’s wishes. The actions of the children’s father’s lawyer, child protection inspector Margrit Pitkve and the judge give the impression of collusion and violation of the law (violation of the notarial agreement) and acting in favor of the children’s father.
2. Legal errors in the case law
It has been alleged that Kuuseväli has made a number of procedural errors that have led to the annulment of his decisions by higher courts. These errors concern procedural issues that call into question the fairness and transparency of judicial processes. While any judge may err from time to time, the Kuuseväli cases are notable for the repetition of errors, which may indicate a systemic problem.
3. Public criticism and loss of credibility
Kuuseväli has received negative public attention for some of his judgments, which have been seen as unfair or disproportionate. Several critics, including lawyers and journalists, have pointed out that his decisions sometimes conflict with the law or general legal principles. This has undermined trust in the judiciary and sparked a broader debate about the independence and accountability of judges in Estonia.
4. Conclusion and need for reform
Ahti Kuuseväli’s mistakes and the charges brought against him point to a broader problem in the Estonian judiciary, where judges’ actions are not always sufficiently scrutinised and decisions can be influenced by external interests. Such cases raise the question of the need for greater oversight and accountability mechanisms to ensure the impartiality of judges and the legitimacy of their judgments.
Since the actions of judges have a direct impact on the credibility of the legal system and the protection of citizens’ rights, it is important that such cases are thoroughly investigated and, where necessary, necessary reforms are introduced.
Source:
